I found both of these articles to
be rather fascinating as I am a women and do not feel that these stereotypes
should even be relevant in todays world. However, if I were to take a step back
and look at it from another perspective I can definitely see how these article
could apply to a women’s everyday life. But in contrast I do not think that anybody’s
identity should define them or what their life is like. For example, just
because someone is a certain race, religion, or gender they should not be
expected to live a different life.
I
like how Giard’s article “Doing Cooking” points out how many people view the
act of cooking to be mundane yet it is just expected of women. Something that I
found very fascinating however, is how Chef’s are typically identified as men.
To me this emphasizes the gender inequality as if women can not be good enough
cooks to be chefs, but a man who enjoys cooking is much superior to a women
cook making him a chef.
I
found Friedan’s article “The Problem that has No Name” to have an interesting
taste. Reading through this article it was clear that this article was written
in the 1960’s. My main reaction after reading this article was that women
during this time seemed to live just to please men. This makes since with the
stereotypes of this time period, however this article almost makes it seem that
the women enjoyed living to please men, meanwhile forgetting about themselves.
I also thought the chef concept was really interesting. Women are looked at as the cookers in a household, but when it comes to the professional business world, men take the reins. I also agree with your statement when you say that race, religion, or gender should not define how you live your life.
ReplyDelete