As De Certeau would have us believe, in
order to study (or to even begin thinking about) everyday life, we can no
longer consider everyday life as “merely the obscure background of social
activity” (xi), but rather as a fundamental and valuable basis of human
existence that plays a major role in determining social structure. The daily
activities we participate in to pass time whether it be reading, conversing,
sleeping, watching television, eating, walking, etc.; these are the practices
that constitute the ways in which we operate and make use of the productions of
mass culture.
According to De Certeau, the ways in which
we carry out these consumptions is in turn another means of production. This is
a new concept to me, but I found it intriguing. For example, popular culture is
not defined solely by sociocultural production nor by the elite ruling class
who control these productions, but rather it is constructed by the way in which
the masses (the middle class) choose to utilize these products. “Only then can
we gauge the difference or similarity between the production of an image and
the secondary production hidden in the process of its utilization.” (xiii) De
Certeau’s research is focused on this difference that occurs between these
primary and secondary productions. Can you think of examples in which we escape
the dominance of mass production by straying from the rules and creating consumer
production?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.